Material Balance
At SMK, we are attempting to analyze and understand the material balance (environmental footprint) of the Group as a whole for each of our processes, from product design and development to manufacture and sales, and to realize non-wasteful business activities.
Environmental Preservation Costs and Benefits
| Category |
Major Activities |
Environmental Preservation Costs |
Economic Benefits Accrued |
Environmental Preservation Benefits (Quantity) |
| Investments |
Expenses |
| Amount |
YoY |
Amount |
YoY |
Amount |
YoY |
Consumption/ Output Savings |
YoY |
| Business area costs |
Pollution prevention |
Operation and maintenance of facilities used to prevent pollution |
1.4 |
185% |
19.6 |
96% |
0 |
- |
Use of Environmentally Hazardous Substances: 10.5 t |
111% |
| Global environmental preservation |
Efficient operation and maintenance of equipment, such as air-conditioners, daily efforts to save energy, etc. |
14.2 |
80% |
42.7 |
101% |
3.5 |
13% |
CO2 emissions per unit of production value: –0.05 t-CO2 /million yen |
- |
| Resource circulation |
Appropriate processing and recycling promotion of industrial waste discharge |
0 |
- |
22.9 |
72% |
153.7 |
64% |
Landfill waste amount: -12.0 t |
- |
Industrial waste discharge per unit of production value: –0.002 t /million yen |
| Sub-total |
- |
15.7 |
85% |
85.3 |
90% |
153.2 |
58% |
- |
Upstream / downstream |
Green procurement |
0 |
- |
0.8 |
16% |
0 |
- |
- |
| Administration |
Elimination of environmentally hazardous substances / Environmental management education, activities for the achievement of certification, etc. |
0.4 |
-
|
167.8 |
100% |
0 |
- |
- |
| R&D |
Development of environmentally friendly products |
0 |
- |
45.0 |
116 |
0 |
- |
- |
| Social activity |
Initiatives to expand green areas at works |
0 |
- |
6.6 |
77% |
0 |
- |
- |
| Environmental remediation |
- |
0 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
0 |
- |
- |
| Total |
- |
15.7 |
83% |
305.6 |
97% |
157.2 |
58% |
- | | |
●Environmental Preservation Costs
Our environmental preservation costs in fiscal 2010 declined against the previous fiscal year, in terms of both investments and expenses. This is because the recent strength of the yen resulted in a decline in costs for overseas bases when these costs were converted into yen. In local currencies, costs have actually increased.
●Economic Benefits
Economic benefits for fiscal 2010 declined against benefits for the previous fiscal year. The main reason for this was that the amount of tools and equipment available for reuse was smaller, and as a result the benefits in this area fell below those for the previous fiscal year.
●Environmental Preservation Benefits
Environmental preservation benefits increased in all of the four categories used in their evaluation. The reasons for CO2- and industrial waste-related increases are explained in "Environmental Preservation Activities." In the case of environmentally hazardous substances, the increase was because the revision of the PRTR Law that sets the standard increased the number of substances subject to aggregation.
●Accounting Procedure |
| (1) |
|
SMK's environmental accounting practices adhere to the Environmental Accounting Guidelines 2005 published by Japanese Ministry of the Environment. |
| (2) |
|
Figures are based on data on capital investments and other expenses (including depreciation cost) required for the environmental preservation activities, as well as data on the benefits accrued from them in terms of money and quantity, from all Japan and overseas sites of the SMK Group. |
| (3) |
|
Data for environmental preservation benefits indicated a decrease in amount compared with the previous fiscal year. A year-on-year comparison is not presented for data without any reduction or comparable results with the previous fiscal year. |
| (4) |
|
Economic benefits accrued are clearly demonstrable and do not include speculative benefits. |
| (5) |
|
For environmentally hazardous substances in the category of environmental preservation benefits, aggregated subjects were the substances regulated under the Law Concerning Reporting, etc. of Releases to the Environment of Specific Chemical Substances and Promoting Improvements in Their Management (Pollutant Release and Transfer Register, or PRTR Law). |